(my article yesterday more …)
America’s serious and major think tanks, one of Rand international senior policy analyst Alireza Nader conversations we Iranian-American rapprochement, Iran, economic and political developments and the Geneva-two talks about the important findings shared with us.
Alireza Nader talks in Geneva-second-thought it was a significant advance for the U.S. public, he said. For Iran, this rapprochement has pointed out that there is an undeniable necessity. Iran’s current economic situation because it affects it stands.
Former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who then whatever comes after the period would be perceived as good. Iranian President Hasan had promised spiritual and economic relief expected from them to do the work. Mr. Nader, Spiritual think that made significant reforms in the.
At the same time Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif also made efforts to improve the economy, just as in external relations also stated that in an effort to improve. Iran to participate in the Geneva conference as the cause of 2-Assad and whether to say yes to a memorandum leaked to throw them back, he said.
Turkish public opinion in general of Iran’s and Syria opposition due to attend a conference in Geneva from 2-negotiations towards the conclusion that the result can not.
I posed my question to himself: “Peace and Security in the Middle East, Turkey can be a leader in providing? The 1937 signed the first regional security alliance in the Middle East “Sadabat Pact,” a top similar to the version of “Sadabat Pact v.2″ is able to provide regional security and peace? As a result, in 1937, Syria, Iraq, Iran, the Kurdish issue continues today on the same issues. U.S., EU and Turkey supports Iran in this regard? ”
In response, Mr. Nader, “Turkey is a country with strong economies and Nato member. However, the capacity can not calculate correctly! My actions and rhetoric carries contradictions. After the Arab awakening mobility could not turn in their favor. Because effective leadership in Iran and Saudi Arabia could not catch. The events in Egypt and Syria ‘could provide an advantage. But it did not succeed in Egypt and Syria. Prime Minister Erdogan could be a model for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt will come to power in a period of three months in Syria, where Assad’s fall could be accurate with their predictions. ”
Nader was, in the most important spot analysis “Turkey in the Middle East, but what Turkey is a major leader can not lead another country.” Nader tried to explain it was in the Middle East based on the current conjuncture;
• Israel wants to strike Iran. But the reason why Miss Lebanon weapons that could hit Israel.
• To keep armed Iran to Hezbollah via Damascus assistance to make weapons. Therefore, the presence of the Assad regime in Syria important for Iran.
So, why Israel abstained standing? If you support Israel, whom credibility is reduced.
Support Israel if Assad regime in Syria’s Alawites that touted his support. If some support against Israel would briefly. Because for a long time by both the jar will be in Israel’s favor.
Nader Iranian-American rapprochement with Israel is the most ideal because it was underlined that reduce tension. Finally, the Iranian-American rapprochement in Washington, DC and the American public about the necessity of much debate underlined.
To the last rib to rib writing my next article will be a continuation of B’nai B’rith International’s executive vice president Dan Mariaschin ‘s’ll share an interview. Middle East and Turkey will try to look from another perspective.
