Turkey’s biggest dispute is that it has too a lot of problems that have piled up with the passage of time. The democratic demands and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party’s (PKK) terrorism upside this listing. These events are the greatest obstructions to Turkey’s intent and potential to become a big country. Your economic operation can be magnificent, merely you go bad to place your potentials fully into use all the same .
This is because internal peace is the chief requirement for playing big and it’s the governmental constancy that will assure your acts to this end. It’s precisely for this reason that during the last decade Turkey has managed to become the world’s 17th biggest economy and could come up the bravery to tackle hard-to-solve problems. We may put it a different way: Had Turkey been free from the past decade’ tuition wars, the military’s memorandas and the opposition’s cooperating with the tutorship, what would have been the county’s actual state?
The Syrian crisis rides at the core of this analysis. The repercussions of the crisis rising from the intended downing of a Turkish reconnaissance jet by Syria are cogent evidence that we’re seating on thin ice. A current debate on Syrian Arab Republic is being wasted as a national political matter. What bangs me is that those who stimulate the Kurds about the victims’ right to resort to violence are as well playing automatic Baath pilots and lend support to bloody-minded dictator Bashar al-Assad. Generally we’d await the reverse, if only they were earnest. If you think Kurds in Turkey confronted inequitable treatment and murder at the hands of the deep state in the past times — this is presently refused by almost nobody — and then you must arouse your voice against the Syrian dictatorship’s killing 12,000 innocent citizenry randomly. Put differently, if you actually would like to make your position in support of the victims, so what you must not do is roll in the foggy corridors of realpolitik but tell the truth.
But that’s not the way it works. Some people tend to specify Assad’s murders as the war against imperialists while denigrating those who passed away as servants of imperialists.
Honestly, I consider the Turkish government’s Syria policy is accurate as a whole. Independent of the downed jet crisis, Turkey has been keeping its ethical position, spearheaded by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Davos, and it has never paid any regard to the formulas of realpolitik. After the assaults began, Turkey attempted to convince Assad for a long time. Prime Minister Erdoğan and Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu personally met Assad, who assured to cease the killings. But Assad didn’t keep his promise and, all the worse, he intensified his massacres.
By nature, we all experienced very deep grief. Personally, I’m glad this grief has been transformed by the government into the political sphere. Without these Turkey-led international pressures, Assad’s massacres could have resulted in ultimate devastation of the country. This is something we had better note.
Regrettably, Syria isn’t like Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and Assad isn’t like Muammar Gaddafi. Any dispute in the region has the potency to spark sectarian wars and Israel might step in after Russian or Iranian involvement. There has been the risk of a high death toll in the event of any effort to prevent this victimhood. Assad’s trump is already to burn everything if anyone tries to burn him down.
So, the downing of the Turkish jet is nothing but a more radical expression of this message for the entire world to see. Assad was successful in this regard. Turkey’s charisma has been severely weakened. I believe affirming the government’s Syria policy is one thing and questioning the errors leading to this incident another. Why did the Turkish jet go against Syrian airspace, in brief, given the fact that there’s the danger of dispute with this country? Why did we give Syria the chance to have the psychological domination?
