In The Middle East After The Turmoil Of America

One of the world’s most important strategist and former u.s. President Jimmy Carter-era national security adviser Zbigniew Brezinsky (strategic vision – the storming of the American and global power)[1] in his book America’s just struggling with his sudden and enter the American system or major crisis, bringing together the global political and economic chaos would lead to a chain reaction.

The country’s increasingly dragging a sprawling decay and/or a broad right to know end with Islamic States in the case of war, the emergence of effective bit of genius in 2025 global successor possible afterward. Until then, including China and the Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991, then America will be ready to hold the role expected from. [2]

Instead, most likely, the international uncertainty and global prosperity is very serious risks for the environment, global and regional power in the distribution of a new building complex is experiencing, instead of the big winner is the loser, much more inconclusive and chaotic era will emerge.

Brezizski a right example this assay has faced the world public opinion. Radical Islamist IŞİD (Islamic State of Iraq Damascus) members, last week Iraq began the offensive in the South of the country as a result of the progress against Al-Arabi from the channel, according to Iraq’s Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, to prevent the progress of IŞİD militants sought help from Washington. [3] a statement asking for help; The air from the United States against militant attacks after he was found from the case. Iraq’s Foreign Minister also; “A military approach will not be sufficient. We accept the need for an urgent political solution “is using the expression.

Obama came to power in 2009, the new principle of prudent foreign policy between the years of 2003-2011 Warrior refused to send troops to the country occupied. U.s. President Barack Obama and a majority of representatives of minority groups and members of the Senate to discuss the developments in the talks.

Iraq and the crisis grows in Western leaders began to voice their concern. Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel, said in a statement that the United States has a special responsibility to address the crisis in Iraq has highlighted. [4]

British Prime Minister David Cameron is to avoid being involved in the conflict in the British Parliament has warned. Cameron, “because it does not have anything to do with us or call out to people who think he will affect: affect us”.

Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel that the United States would attack Iraq ‘ is a responsibility to intervene. So, what will be the U.S. does not fulfill that responsibility? The UNITED STATES really too tight?

The first answer in the rest of the book in question America Brzezinski post likely signs of turmoil ‘ will emerge as a leader in the analysis will emerge in the absence of uncertainty, while increasing the tension between the opponents, serves their own interests to act in such a way that might be causing by doing picking giving the answer. [5]

Thus, in line with their interests, some powers of the alternative will create special stabilisation frames with encouraging regional arrangements, weakening the international cooperation is possible. Historical racers can enter a more open to challenge regional domination or even basic geopolitical changes in the distribution of power that occurs as a result of the new power alignments in threatened, they can find themselves in a serious way. The promotion of democracy, authoritarianism, nationalism and religion, on the basis of more national security variable mixtures can quest. [6]

U.S. DECLINES?

This idea today many academics and think tanks in America believes that including ‘. More precisely, all believers, reverse the regression policies advocating an exaggerated way the Republicans are weighted in the Falcon.

Immanuel Wallerstein in a chaotic world of American power in the thesis in the book he wrote about gerileyişi “Eagle crashed into the ground” as the UNITED STATES has already begun the end of hegemony turned out to be the belief that, unlike the attacks of September 11, 2001, in which everyone’s side a milat or startup. [7] as a global power, America’s star has been decreasing after the 1970s. The response to the terrorist attacks has accelerated this regression.

Wallerstein, Pax American ‘ is why is deteriorating, twenty of the last thirty years of the 20th century, especially since the turn of the century jeopolitiğini the reviewer suggests that it requires. This review reveals a simple and inevitable result: United States hegemony contributed to the economic, political and military factors, leading to the decline in the U.S. in the future against the uncontested lead to the same factors. [8]

Brzezinski, strategic vision in his book America’s main challenge in the next ten years and the geography of the Western world, the mandatory responsibility, resulting from wider and more vivid to make again, at the same time supporting the complex balances in the East of China’s rising global to provide a constructive way to the position of compliance and will be released on a global scale is the most important responsibility of preventing chaos. [9]

The Result

            American foreign policy values or interests or idealism or realism it when we find an answer to the question forwarded to the United States in the face of current events in the Middle East, we can understand how the action would take.

American former Foreign Minister and national security of the United States consulting, who was Henry Kissinger; “America’s foreign policy Needs?” in his book the changing nature of the international environment for Americans understanding indicates that this situation would be considered; This is a status quo situation ailments, useful is not temporary interventions. Instead, it is a snapshot of communications, economic globalization and international order that most of the important actors on the inside, the returns resulting from the change in the international order inevitability. [10]

As a result, especially Obama was seen changing in the Government’s foreign policy must be understood and right; War on terrorism, over everything the international system appeared unusual opportunity to reshape American foreign policy, which is not the ultimate test for the protection. [11]

After the cold war, Post-Imperial Russia and advancing to the position of great power in China is an important global player, followed by India in the face of rising State of America’s foreign policy and the Middle East to begin a prudently managing the internal structure changes in the cautious approach directed a failed foreign policy of America, should not the meaning.